My first job working for an association was a whirlwind of learning, confusion, and opportunity. That first year I was introduced to a director who would become a lifelong friend (the newlywed, Ginny Hussong), membership at ASAE (my professional home), and the wild, wild world of association chapter management.
My task was to build a chapter program from the ground up and thanks to the advice of my dear friend (and new boss at the time), Ginny, I found great pearls of wisdom on the ASAE Component Relations listserv and by following the advice of one Cynthia D'Amour.
Cynthia D'Amour is not only one of the most creative personalities you will ever meet, but she lives and breathes chapter relations and leadership development. She is a supportive and knowledgeable soul and is widely recognized for her abilities as well as her vibrant red hair. Cynthia actually wrote the book on component relations (actually, she has written several books on leadership and component relations) and is an avid supporter of the chapter professional community online and everywhere she goes.
Her advice helped me build a chapter program from the ground up in my early association days and this Wednesday (May 26, 2010) she will share her expertise on a free conference call, "Helping Struggling Components Succeed."
You can read more about Cynthia on her blog at http://cynthiadamour.com/, but if you are in any way interested in leadership of groups or chapter-relations, definitely register for the call on Wednesday. You won't be sorry!
Register here: http://www.asaecenter.org/ProgramsEvents/EventDetail.cfm?ItemNumber=50337
Monday, May 24, 2010
Friday, May 21, 2010
Hurt So Good: I Need to Be a Better Team Player
Whine, whine, whine. That's what I feel like doing. But I can't because I'm the problem.
Okay, so you see, this is how it works...I try really hard to do a good job with most things. But, recently I received word from someone that I didn't do this one thing so well. In fact, she felt confused, uncomfortable, even lied to. Not good.
I had a few excuses already popping into my head for why things didn't turn out better. My natural inclination is to find excuses or get defensive. But I didn't want to do that because at the end of the day, I knew I could have and should have done better.
How could I have let this happen? At some level I was afraid of showing my ignorance, I'm sure. But it was more than that...it was not accepting true ownership over a project that I was sharing with someone else. And, to some extent, not being a good team player.
Have you ever done that? Been co-presenting with someone and left something to the last minute? Or worked on a project that someone else leads, and you kind of falter along barely scraping by with your support work?
Communication is so important. I am great at it in so many areas in my life, but when it comes to establishing boundaries with some projects, I am often afraid of "stepping on toes" or "being a drag" on someone else. Therefore, I am not jumping at the chance to ask for more help or to taking control of projects that need me to provide guidance.
This is a confessional sort of post. Therapeutic. I would love to hear if any of you face these same situations. Do you find it hard to establish your place in a team project when you are not the leader? I like being in charge of a well-defined project, but have always (even all the way back in grade school science projects) done better when working alone.
Ironically, I never necessarily saw myself as a leader. I imagined myself in that position, but never thought I had the charisma to pull it off. Now, charisma is the least of my concerns...I just want to be a valuable team player and never let someone down again like I did today.
How can I prevent this from happening again?
Okay, so you see, this is how it works...I try really hard to do a good job with most things. But, recently I received word from someone that I didn't do this one thing so well. In fact, she felt confused, uncomfortable, even lied to. Not good.
I had a few excuses already popping into my head for why things didn't turn out better. My natural inclination is to find excuses or get defensive. But I didn't want to do that because at the end of the day, I knew I could have and should have done better.
How could I have let this happen? At some level I was afraid of showing my ignorance, I'm sure. But it was more than that...it was not accepting true ownership over a project that I was sharing with someone else. And, to some extent, not being a good team player.
Have you ever done that? Been co-presenting with someone and left something to the last minute? Or worked on a project that someone else leads, and you kind of falter along barely scraping by with your support work?
Communication is so important. I am great at it in so many areas in my life, but when it comes to establishing boundaries with some projects, I am often afraid of "stepping on toes" or "being a drag" on someone else. Therefore, I am not jumping at the chance to ask for more help or to taking control of projects that need me to provide guidance.
This is a confessional sort of post. Therapeutic. I would love to hear if any of you face these same situations. Do you find it hard to establish your place in a team project when you are not the leader? I like being in charge of a well-defined project, but have always (even all the way back in grade school science projects) done better when working alone.
Ironically, I never necessarily saw myself as a leader. I imagined myself in that position, but never thought I had the charisma to pull it off. Now, charisma is the least of my concerns...I just want to be a valuable team player and never let someone down again like I did today.
How can I prevent this from happening again?
- Being clear about the status of what I am working on
- Not shying away from difficult situations/conversations
- Admitting when I disagree with the way something is happening
- Just doing the boring backup stuff
- Communicating to the point of annoyance
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Tassels
Tassels can provide the finishing touch on furniture or drapes. They can also help you distinguish your alpaca from someone else's in Peru. Are tassels essential? No. But they are fun, entertaining, and helpful should you need to grab the right alpaca in a quick getaway.
Why are you looking at me with that smirk on your face? Was it something I said? Do you know where your organization's tassels are?
I remember discovering one organization's tassels buried on their website. Three, maybe four, steps into their content, there it was...a blog with (gasp!) activity - a real conversation had been taking place - and then I saw there were no new posts in the past three months. When I asked about the forgotten blog, the marketing director told me the chair had changed and the new chair wasn't interested in things like blogs. So, the once shiny new toy was placed to the side and buried.
I asked the marketing director why they hadn't asked another leader to take it on and he told me they hadn't considered it. After a little more discussion, we changed subjects and went on to discuss other things.
A few months later, I visited their website and saw a rejuvenated website...and a revival of their blog with a snappy button for people to subscribe if they so chose. Apparently, they had discovered a new leader to write for their blog and were proudly sharing it with their members! They hadn't invented an entirely new concept. They hadn't even created a new communication method. They just gave something another look and added the sparkle back to it. Energy in - energy out. *Jazz hands*
So, what do you say, are you ready to swing your tassels? I'll bet your members are.
Sunday, May 2, 2010
Social Media Events I’m Interested In (Mostly in DC Area - some elsewhere)
2nd Tuesdays Tech ‘tails and Networking Salon May 11, 5:30pm at Gua Rapo, Arlington, dc The Capital Cabal presents 2nd Tuesday, a special networking event for all D.C. area techies, webbies, quasi-webbies, and smart business people who appreciate a smart crowd. <--probably going to this!
Making Your Media Matter May 12 Washington, D.C. Making Your Media Matter is a conference for established and aspiring filmmakers, nonprofit communications leaders, funders and students looking to learn and share cutting-edge practices for making their media matter.
Winning Media Strategies May 20–22 Washington, D.C. BIA/Kelsey’s annual conference focused on the latest developments and trends for enhancing the traditional media business and creating the progressive change television, radio, cable and newspaper companies must make to ensure long-term success.
Conference on Weblogs and Social Media May 23–26 Washington, D.C. The 4th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media brings together researchers from disparate disciplines to increase our understanding of social media in all its incarnations. This event will be held in Washington, D.C., where government innovators are experimenting with the use of social media to increase transparency and better engage with the citizenry.
Gov 2.0 Expo May 25–27 Washington, D.C. Government 2.0 is about empowering government employees to serve citizens better and opening up the government into a platform that enables citizens to better help their communities.
TWTRCON NY June 14 New York TWTRCON NY is a one-day conference focused entirely on the business use of Twitter where you’ll see case studies and learn best practices from leading organizations that are using the real-time Web to deliver bottom-line results.
Gnomedex Aug. 19–21 Seattle Gnomedex is a top gathering of geeks, open source pioneers and cool kids.
Inbound Marketing Summit — Boston Oct. 6–7 Boston Chris Brogan presents the third in a series of social influence marketing conferences for 2010.
Online News Association Oct. 28–30 Washington, D.C. The 10th annual gathering of new media movers and shakers, journalists and online news managers.
LeWeb Dec. Paris LeWeb is the top Internet event in Europe, with 2,400 participants from 50 countries attending in 2009. No date yet for the 2010 event.
Friday, April 30, 2010
Thursday, April 29, 2010
Benchmarking in an Instant: Help ASAE Help Us
Hey ASAE member #assnchat peeps! Just found out ASAE needs our help to fill out assn survey...http://www.asaecenter.org/PublicationsResources/instantpandp.cfm? Let's help!
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Call It Anything, ...But Call It!
Working with many different types of people means encountering all kinds of interpretations and reactions to seemingly innocuous words. I remember Jeff De Cagna saying, '"If you want to see an association exec's head explode just say the word, "wiki."'
Other popular social tech words still have this same effect for many people. Here are several that I've observed people grapple with within the past week:
Other popular social tech words still have this same effect for many people. Here are several that I've observed people grapple with within the past week:
- Social Media
- Twitter (and anything "twelated" to Twitter)
- Wiki
- Blog
- Augmented reality
- Mobile tech
- Location-based tech
Social Media is a newer type of communication that mostly falls into the same patterns that apply to any type of common sense rules about relating information to people: Don't lie. Get to the point. Be human.
What I hate is watching someone who has much experience and intelligence shut down because of a lack of understanding with new words that apparently seem threatening. As a result, I (and others around me) have been attempting to find better ways to get our messages across without using what we might consider the most descriptive or accurate words in our immediate grasp. "Social Media" becomes "electronic marketing" or "emerging media" or "enhanced communication channels" because of our listener's preconceived notion that social media is what 12-year-olds do and is some kind of kiddish fad that could cause more problems than solve.
There are many reasons why these fearful people should hear past their trigger words. You can read blogs by this person, this person, and this person and get a good idea of why it is a good idea to give up misgivings about particular words in order to see a more important lesson...that social media is not a fad and your biggest risk is not getting involved at all.
Anyone have stories to share about crafting your language to avoid scaring off the Luddites in your midst?
What words scare you? When I start hearing people talk about sports and the stock market, should I really be looking at that as an opportunity to educate myself and not to shut my listening down?
What say ye, dear readers?
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
DelCor Social Media Sweet Spot Webcast ASAE Annual Participation
It's time to start planning for DelCor's Social Media Sweet Spot Webcast ASAE Annual coverage and participation! You can help out by taking this poll and sharing your thoughts with me. Of course, we'll also start discussing on the webcast each Friday at 12:30 p.m. EDT.
Talk with you soon!
Talk with you soon!
Monday, April 19, 2010
What’s Stopping Them From Joining? (CRP Virtual Lunch Date)
Title: CRP Virtual Lunch Date
Date(s): Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Location: Virtual - Audio Only
Member Fee: $0.00
Non-Member Fee: $0.00
CAE Hours: Earn up to 1 hours
Program Description
Each month the component relations section has a discussion on a topic of interest to its members. Share with your fellow CRPs your challenges and successes. This is an opportunity to bring new ideas to the table and get some feedback! Follow the discussion on Twitter at #CRPLunch.
This Month's Topic: What’s Stopping Them From Joining?
Register Now: http://bit.ly/9FE0Ux
Guest Presenters:
* Please note: this is an Audio Only program.
Time: Noon - 1:00 pm EDT
Fee: Complimentary
Cancellation Policy: We are requesting courtesy cancellations within three business days prior to the start of the program.
Date(s): Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Location: Virtual - Audio Only
Member Fee: $0.00
Non-Member Fee: $0.00
CAE Hours: Earn up to 1 hours
Program Description
Each month the component relations section has a discussion on a topic of interest to its members. Share with your fellow CRPs your challenges and successes. This is an opportunity to bring new ideas to the table and get some feedback! Follow the discussion on Twitter at #CRPLunch.
This Month's Topic: What’s Stopping Them From Joining?
Register Now: http://bit.ly/9FE0Ux
Guest Presenters:
- Lorna Kent, American Society for Microbiology
- Tracy Rettie, CAE, American Staffing Association
* Please note: this is an Audio Only program.
Time: Noon - 1:00 pm EDT
Fee: Complimentary
Cancellation Policy: We are requesting courtesy cancellations within three business days prior to the start of the program.
Friday, April 2, 2010
Censorship in the Digital Age
Last week Acronym Blog, produced by the American Society for Association Executives (ASAE), added a thought-provoking post titled, "Consultant Wasteland," with the first sentence reading, "Why Consultants Suck."
The content of the post wasn’t scandalous, but the dramatic title and first sentence struck some people as offensive and the post was quickly removed -- but not before several regular association bloggers had already read and commented on the post (and not before the post arrived in various feed readers, which saved the post in spite of it no longer being available on the main website).
ASAE eventually responded in the mounting list of comments to their replacement post explaining the deletion, but that did not seem to quell the conversation's hungry spirit. Association bloggers and ASAE members connected by social media networks continue to debate and discuss the reasons behind the retraction of the article. To be honest, there hasn’t been much of a debate as most of the people talking seem to agree matters were handled poorly in this case.
But what should ASAE have done? Several suggestions have been made, some of which include:
1. The post should have been reviewed before it was posted so that a phrase like, "Why Consultants Suck" wouldn't have been released in the first place.
2. The post should have been edited after discovering the parts that angered people, and had those parts removed.
3. The post should have remained "as is" and ASAE's official response been made in the comments or as a follow-up post.
1. The post should have been reviewed before it was posted so that a phrase like, "Why Consultants Suck" wouldn't have been released in the first place.
2. The post should have been edited after discovering the parts that angered people, and had those parts removed.
3. The post should have remained "as is" and ASAE's official response been made in the comments or as a follow-up post.
In reading up about other blog censoring issues, I ran across the Washington Post case from earlier this year involving a controversial stance and some pointed phrases being eliminated from a piece about DC schools chancellor Michelle Rhee. http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2010/01/28/who-censored-the-washington-posts-rhee-item/
What the Washington Post example showed me was that even if the article had been altered to have “watered down” language, the response would have remained the same.
People are having issues with not being allowed the chance to review and comment on the post and with the very real possibility that this instance may cause people to self-censor potentially important controversial subjects that need to be discussed in open with other association professionals.
People are having issues with not being allowed the chance to review and comment on the post and with the very real possibility that this instance may cause people to self-censor potentially important controversial subjects that need to be discussed in open with other association professionals.
Many voices from the ether seem to be saying, “We are adults. Allow us to deal with these subjects on our own.”
Times have a'changed, folks. We can't make something like a controversial blog post just disappear, so we have to approach it in another fashion. We have to smartly address issues head on and in public (gasp!) and not be afraid to anger the people who rather shut uncomfortable conversations down than see unpleasant words on their association blog.
There are two sides to every story. Ultimately, we need to recognize that from this particular situation there is obviously a need to discuss consultant-client relationships and expectations AND a need to identify procedures for controversial public blog posts in an age when nothing disappears.
What do you think?
There are two sides to every story. Ultimately, we need to recognize that from this particular situation there is obviously a need to discuss consultant-client relationships and expectations AND a need to identify procedures for controversial public blog posts in an age when nothing disappears.
What do you think?
-KiKi
NOTE: Somewhere in the thick of the conversation, someone asserted that this wasn't a case of censorship...so just to be clear -
Definition:
Censorship is the suppression of speech or deletion of communicative material, which may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or inconvenient to the government or media organizations as determined by a censor.
Censorship. (2010, April 2).
In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 17:44, April 2, 2010, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Censorship&oldid=353475013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



